Colombian Prisons and Prisoners Mirror Class Struggle
Journalist / periodista. People’s Weekly World
Prisoners in Colombia have recently gained new visibility. Prisoner protest actions are one factor. Another is discussion at the Havana peace talks of prisoners as victims of armed conflict. November 2014 marks the two-year anniversary of talks between the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Colombian government.
Beginning on October 20, hunger strikes and rejection of prison rules spread throughout 14 Colombian prisons. Spokespersons for the National Prison Movement (Movimiento Nacional Carcelario — MNC), organizer of the demonstrations, denounced overcrowding, miserable healthcare, impediments to family visiting, poor food, filthy sanitary conditions, and contaminated and scarce water. They accused prison authorities of torture, reprisals, and corruption. Guards at Cómbita prison bent on intimidation placed political prisoners in isolation. Tramacúa prison in Valledupar was cited as "the number one center for torture and systematic violation of human rights." Tramacúa, some say, is the "Guantanamo of Colombia."
Earlier the MNC called for a declaration of humanitarian emergency; passage of Law 082 which reduces sentences by 20 percent; eight-hour family visits; "real, definitive, and immediate" solutions for the prison healthcare crisis; and no more extraditions (a Colombia-U.S. agreement provides for extradition every month of 15-20 Colombians — most facing drug trafficking charges — in return for a U.S. subsidy).
The MNC had also organized hunger strikes in multiple prisons in April 2013, too. The MNC’s demands at that time included prevention and education instead of incarceration, reduced or alternative sentencing, and recognition of special status for political prisoners.
Recently Bogota’s El Tiempo newspaper published a report, with photos, documenting Colombia’s prison scandal. One learns that, as of June 2014, Colombia’s 138 prisons originally built to accommodate 76,553 prisoners were housing 117,018 prisoners — or 40,465 over the limit. The medium security prison in Riohacha, in Colombia’s northeast, has 538 prisoners occupying space for 100 prisoners.
According to the report, 34.5 percent of prisoners, some imprisoned for six years, have yet to be convicted or sentenced. Mentally ill prisoners are part of the general prison population, 108 children live with their imprisoned mothers, and employment is available for only 1,441 prisoners. Re-socialization and educational activities are impossible because 117,018 prisoners must share 544 prison common areas.
Expressions of FARC solidarity with the protests added to public awareness. In an October 28 statement, the FARC peace delegation "raise[d] its voice in solidarity with the prisoners and political prisoners involved with a hunger strike and peaceful disobedience." The FARC backed MNC demands and named five prisoners who died without adequate medical care. The statement condemned "death and destruction" following a recent fire in the Barranquilla prison and denounced violent repression of peaceful demonstrators at the Cómbita prison. The FARC urged "solutions for the structural problems and the deep crisis of the decadent and crumbling national prison system converted [now] into a scene of torture, crimes, and flagrant violations of human rights."
The FARC negotiating team provides reports on its "Minimum Proposals" on various agenda items, the most recent being on the question of victims. Political prisoners — both captured insurgents and imprisoned non-combatant dissenters, the FARC claims — are "victims of the conflict." FARC negotiators seek establishment of a "special study commission regarding the situation of political prisoners." The commission "would identify victims of the state’s justice system subjected to judicial sham for political reasons."
Successive Colombian governments have lumped armed resistance groups and peaceful dissenters, jailed insurgents and non-violent prisoners of conscience, all together as enemies of the state. By doing so they made the main schism within Colombian society readily apparent.
Colombian governments have long primarily served big landowners, as well as business and financial elites. Governments have sought to protect their use and control of land. Those attempting to speak and act on behalf of Colombia’s majority population are on the other side. Thus the context within which the fate of prisoners is shaped is one of conflict between social classes.
The list of victims of that conflict is long: hundreds of striking banana workers murdered in Ciénaga in 1928; thousands of land-hungry small farmers killed prior to Jorge Eliécer Gaitán’s assassination in 1948; 200,000 rebellious peasants killed over the following ten years; and tens of thousands of political dissidents, real and imagined, killed after 1964 when the FARC came into existence. FARC insurgents originally were small farmers defending their right to land. Millions of Colombians displaced from land are victims too.
In one set of their "Minimum Proposals," FARC peace negotiators name the parties responsible for creating victims. That the U.S. government is one of them further confirms the class-based nature of victimization of prisoners. That government’s hostility to working or poor people’s mobilizations is well known.
The FARC negotiating team recognizes "the central responsibility of the United States in the origin, persistence, and dynamics of expansion, escalation, and intensification of the conflict, in different phases and facets. The result has been to generate processes of systemic victimization."
In recent weeks, delegations of Colombian victims traveled to Havana to testify before the peace negotiators. The fourth such delegation consisting of 11 former prisoners did so on November 3-5. An empty chair at their hearing would have been occupied by jailed FARC guerrilla Tulio Murilla had Colombian authorities not refused permission for him to travel and testify.
A video rendition of Murillo’s testimony became a dramatic highlight. As reported on Pacocol.org, the Web site of the Colombian Communist Party, Murillo gave "voice to prisoners demanding that the humanitarian crisis in Colombian prisons be overcome." They are in prison, he charged, because of vague allegations of "rebellion" or "terrorism" and because criminal proceedings yield "judicial false positives."
The Colombian army captured Tulio Murillo during combat operations. Torture in prison caused wounds that led to his leg being amputated. The video rendition of his testimony, recorded in the Cúcuta prison amidst a crowd of prisoners, shows images of prison life.
Academician Francisco Javier Tolosa, himself a former political prisoner, points out that: "In the midst of the acute prison and judicial crisis the country is going though . . . we, eleven thousand political prisoners, do exist in Colombia." Furthermore, "we require recognition as such, and also as victims of this social, armed conflict. We must have an actual voice in the building of a stable, long-lasting, and democratic peace."  Prisoner victims of class struggle got an internationalist boost recently from a letter sent by poet Marcos Ana from Spain. A steadfast anti-fascist, Ana spent 23 years in prisons of the Franco dictatorship and was twice condemned to death.
Ana wrote: "Solidarity has no borders or distances and all of us know of your existence and we are proud of your struggle and your sacrifices. . . . We shall pull you out of the shadows and return the light of day to you and the freedom they snatched from you. Let peoples by the hundreds come calling and looking for you with their red lamps advancing from the five parts of the world!"
David Ravelo, a leader of Colombia’s Communist Party, is serving an 18-year jail term. Ana sent him a book of his poems. Inside, Ravelo found a message inscribed: "They wounded us, struck us down, even killed us, but they never turned us."
 The quote is from Tolosa’s new book titledColombia on the Road to Liberty and Peace, Chapter Two.